12 June 2026
When we pay for expert advice we are paying for trust in someone's judgement, not only for their knowledge. As AI systems enter professional services, the unresolved question is what happens when machine and human judgement disagree. Antlar's answer is a design commitment: a human stays in the loop on all decision-making, and technology is never used as a substitute for human judgement.
29 May 2026
As AI becomes more capable and widely adopted, the value of an institution and the value of the individuals inside it are separating. When that relationship frays, it becomes clear how much of someone's value was ever the person and how much was the role, the brand and the credential around them. The position that survives is neither refusing the tool nor holding the tool without the craft, but combining both.
1 May 2026
From 10 December 2026, Australian Privacy Principle 1 requires an organisation to disclose in its privacy policy where a computer program uses personal information to make a decision that could significantly affect someone's rights or interests. Strata is unusually exposed to this, because scheme correspondence routinely carries health information, financial identifiers, dispute records and voting histories. Antlar's approach is to identify personal information and replace it with non-identifying placeholders before any content leaves Australian infrastructure, so third-party AI providers never receive names, contact details or financial identifiers at all.
10 April 2026
The cost of creating information has fallen to near zero, which makes verification a skill rather than an afterthought and makes trust the scarce commodity. In property, trust has always been the backbone of business development, so technology that removes or minimises it does not get adopted regardless of its capability. Antlar's position is to apply AI in strata without removing human decision-making and accountability, eroding privacy, or diminishing the role of professionals.